Described as “the preeminent cable practitioner” and “is very gifted in his ability to develop fresh arguments and communicates them orally and in writing with grace and effectiveness.”Chambers USA 2018

Matthew A. Brill

Washington, D.C.
  • 555 Eleventh Street, NW
  • Suite 1000
  • Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
  • USA
 
 

Matthew Brill, Global Chair of the Communications Law Practice and a member of the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice, is a nationally recognized communications lawyer and former FCC senior official. He represents clients in litigation, regulatory, and transactional matters.

Mr. Brill advises service providers, investors, lenders, and other clients on traditional telecommunications, media, and emerging technology issues. He regularly represents:

  • Leading cable operators
  • Local exchange carriers
  • Wireless carriers
  • Internet service providers
  • Technology companies
  • Online platforms

Mr. Brill represents clients in proceedings before:

  • The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
  • Trial and appellate courts
  • State public utility commissions and attorneys general

Mr. Brill served as the Senior Legal Advisor and Chief of Staff to Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy at the FCC. His work at the FCC included developing national policies governing:

  • Broadband Internet access
  • Voice-over-IP (VoIP) services
  • Local telephone competition
  • Universal service subsidies
  • Intercarrier compensation arrangements
  • Spectrum allocation

He served as a law clerk to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Brill is an active member of the Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) and has chaired the FCBA’s Common Carrier Practice Committee.

Mr. Brill’s experience includes representing:

Litigation
  • The television industry in a federal court challenge to the constitutionality of a state law requiring sale of all cable channels and programs on an à la carte basis
  • The cable industry association in FCC and appellate proceedings regarding net neutrality rules and in related preemption challenges to state net neutrality laws
  • Various parties in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation in appellate and trial courts (including several prominent victories defeating class certification and favorably construing key statutory provisions)
  • The cable industry in D.C. Circuit appeal of FCC rules governing findings of effective competition in the video marketplace
  • Cable operators in successfully defeating several federal class actions alleging tying of premium cable services and cable set-top boxes
Transactional
  • Time Warner Cable in obtaining regulatory approval for its merger with Charter Communications, and in prior proposed merger with Comcast Corp.
  • Time Warner Cable in its various acquisitions of cable systems and telecommunications assets, and sale of wireless spectrum
  • T-Mobile independent directors in connection with proposed merger with Sprint
  • Private equity purchasers of Cequel Communications
  • Private equity purchasers of Hargray Communications
Regulatory
  • The cable industry association in FCC and appellate proceedings regarding net neutrality rules and in related preemption challenges to state net neutrality laws
  • Comcast in FCC proceedings regarding broadband data services and in related appeal
  • Charter and other telecommunications carriers in appeals of Universal Service Administrative Company rulings regarding compliance with E-rate program rules
  • A broad coalition of local exchange carriers seeking a declaratory ruling regarding the application of intercarrier compensation rules to wireless traffic transmitted by interexchange carriers
  • A leading cable operator in a congressional investigation of customer service issues
 
 
 
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.