Sarah Mitchell represents clients in high-stakes, complex litigation, and business disputes.
Sarah draws on deep experience in all stages of civil litigation across many jurisdictions, from pre-suit negotiations and settlements through to appeal, to advise both defendants and plaintiffs in disputes involving:
Trade secrets
Land use and real estate development
Breach of contract
Breach of fiduciary duty
Unfair competition
Business torts
Employment
Copyright
Computer fraud statutes
Class actions
Environmental matters
Her clients include commercial leaders in the data center, artificial intelligence, and cryptocurrency industries, as well as developers of large-scale construction projects and major players in sports and entertainment. She has experience in state and federal trial courts, as well as in arbitration, examining witnesses, arguing dispositive motions, drafting pleadings, taking and defending depositions, conducting investigations, and managing discovery efforts.
A recognized leader at the firm, Sarah has served on the Training and Career Enhancement Committee. She also maintains an active pro bono practice, including finalizing several adoptions through the Alliance for Children’s Rights.
Sarah served as a judicial law clerk to Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While in law school, she served as a judicial extern to Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the US District Court for the Central District of California.
Experience
Sarah’s experience includes representing:
A leading real estate investment trust in a successful trial concerning a significant shopping center redevelopment project
A global data center developer and operator in a dispute concerning enforcement of a restrictive land covenant in northern Nevada
A leading online gaming platform in securing dismissal of widely publicized defamation and antitrust claims
A public affairs firm in a closely watched restrictive covenant dispute involving former partners
The joint liquidators of a prominent cryptocurrency hedge fund in bankruptcy litigation involving major cryptocurrency funds
A national governing body for sport in arbitration brought by a prominent athlete
Leading shopping center owners and developers in litigation challenging municipal regulations
A Latham team, led by partners Chris Harris and Adam Goldberg and counsel Tiffany Ikeda Austin, won a bench trial in Delaware Bankruptcy Court that will enable the joint liquidators of Three Arrows Capital to amend its claim in the FTX bankruptcy from US$120 million to US$1.5 billion.
Firm honored by Law360 for advising startups, financial institutions, VCs, digital asset and Web3 participants, and corporations on their most innovative and complex transactions, investigations, litigation, and regulatory matters.
Garnering widespread media coverage, defendants, including clients Chess.com and Play Magnus, won dismissal of antitrust claims with entire complaint tossed.
Purported defamation and antitrust claims for US$100 million stem from headline-grabbing allegations of cheating at chess.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.