Jordan Cook represents a variety of clients on complex commercial litigation, with an emphasis on securities litigation, complex business disputes, professional liability, activism, and class action litigation.
Jordan assists companies, management, and boards of directors in connection with:
Securities class action suits
Shareholder derivative litigation
Books-and-records demands
M&A, activism, and Delaware corporate governance
SEC enforcement matters
Jordan is on the Board of the Federal Bar Association (OC Chapter) and serves on the Training and Career Enhancement Committee. She has previously served on the Associates and Technology Committees. Prior to joining Latham, Jordan worked at another AmLaw50 firm representing clients in complex commercial litigation matters.
Experience
Jordan’s recent cases include representing:
Amgen – Obtained complete summary judgment in a securities class action alleging false and misleading statements relating to Phase III trial results and a New Drug Application (N.D. Cal.)
Desktop Metal – Defeated motion to expedite breach of fiduciary duty claims against Desktop Metal and certain of its officers and directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery in connection with a shareholder rights plan (Del. Ch.)
Masimo – Won civil contempt order and sanctions against activist stockholder in connection with proxy contest for control of healthcare-technology company’s board (C.D. Cal.)
Kohl’s – Won dismissal of securities class action involving retailer’s management of supply chain matters and revenue reporting (E.D. Wis.)
GoodRx – Won dismissal of a securities class action challenging statements related to GoodRx’s disclosures surrounding its relationship with large grocery chain (C.D. Cal.)
Puma Biotechnology: At trial, defeated more than 95 percent of plaintiffs’ claimed damages in rare Section 10(b) securities class action to go to jury verdict, named by the Daily Journal as one of the Top Verdicts of 2019 (C.D. Cal.)
GoodRx – Won final dismissal of securities class action challenging company’s IPO disclosures following major competitor’s entry into prescription-drug pricing market (C.D. Cal.)
OSI Systems – Won dismissal of securities fraud claims against electronic systems developer and senior executives based on claims prompted by short seller Muddy Waters (C.D. Cal.)
Alteryx – Won final first-round dismissal of securities class action against technology company following withdrawal of guidance in the early days of the pandemic (C.D. Cal.)
Desktop Metal, Inc. – Won dismissal of securities fraud claims against 3D printing company based on whistleblower investigation (Del. Ch.)
Investment Banks – Achieved walk-away settlement and dismissal of underwriters in Section 11 litigation arising from IPO of ChemBio (E.D.N.Y.)
Prometheus Biosciences in its US$11 billion acquisition by Merck (D. Del., S.D.N.Y.)
Cerner Corp. in US$28.3 billion acquisition by Oracle (E.D.N.Y.), named among the Deal Awards Most Outstanding Deal of the Year in 2022
Qualifications
Bar Qualification
California
Education
JD, University of Southern California Gould School of Law, 2013 Managing Editor, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal
BA in Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008
Latham litigators recognized for securing a First Circuit decision affirming Latham’s lower court win, knocking out securities claims against 3D printing technology company Desktop Metal.
Despite a downward trend in securities case filings over the past three years, Latham & Watkins LLP has remained one of the most active law firms on the defense side, taking over the top spot from Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, according to reports released by Lex Machina.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.