Santiago Bejarano represents multinational corporations, state-owned enterprises, and sovereign states in high-stakes international disputes under both civil and common law regimes.

Santiago draws on more than 15 years of cross-border experience to represent clients in international commercial and investment arbitrations conducted under all major institutional and ad hoc rules.

He has handled proceedings seated in leading arbitral forums, including New York; Washington, D.C.; London; The Hague; and Paris, in more than twenty arbitrations administered by:

  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS)
  • American Arbitration Association (AAA)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)

Dual-qualified in Colombia and New York, Santiago regularly conducts advocacy in Spanish-language or dual-language arbitrations and has significant experience representing clients in matters involving Latin America. He has acted for clients in a wide variety of industries, business sectors, and subject-matter, including the licensing of intellectual property, M&A transactions, and distribution, along with the development, distribution, and commercialization of energy, oil, and gas.

Beyond his arbitration work, Santiago has helped clients navigate high-profile government investigations and inquiries, white collar matters, and multijurisdictional internal investigations.

He maintains an active pro bono practice, advising clients on immigration-related matters. In recognition of this work, he received the Legal Aid Society’s Pro Bono Publico Award in 2015.

A recognized thought leader, Santiago is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, where he teaches a course in international arbitration, and frequently speaks at international arbitration conferences around the world.

Santiago’s experience includes representing:

  • A North American project developer in connection with a dispute governed by Spanish law, related to the construction and development of a major photovoltaic project portfolio in northern Spain
  • A major private equity firm in an SIAC arbitration, seated in Singapore and governed by New York law, in connection with a services agreement termination in the healthcare sector
  • Cálidda, a Peruvian gas utility company that is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo de Energia de Bogotá, in an ICSID arbitration arising out of the concession for the gas infrastructure network in the city of Lima
  • Novenergia II in enforcing an arbitral award against the Kingdom of Spain under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), currently pending before D.C. courts
  • Latin American subsidiaries of a major US pharmaceutical company in successive ICC arbitrations, seated in Paris and governed by Colombian law, in disputes related to an M&A transaction in Latin America
  • A North American investment fund in an ICC arbitration, seated in New York and governed by New York law, in a dispute related to the purchase of a major renewable energy project portfolio in Northern Mexico
  • A leading Japanese hardware manufacturer in a JAMS arbitration, seated in San Diego and governed by California law, in a dispute over a license agreement
  • A leading Latin American pharmaceutical business in an ICC arbitration, seated in London and governed by English and Colombian law, in a dispute related to a distribution agreement for highly specialized medications
  • A South American airline in a post-M&A ICC arbitration, seated in New York and governed by New York law, relating to the sale of an airline business in South America
  • The Dominican Republic in an ICSID Additional Facility arbitration, seated in Washington, D.C., related to a contract for gold tailings processing and environmental remediation
  • A leading American biomedical company in an AAA arbitration, seated in Chicago and governed by Delaware law, in a dispute relating to a research collaboration agreement in the oncology field
  • A major American technology company in a JAMS arbitration, seated in New York and governed by Delaware law, in a dispute arising from the termination of a services agreement
  • An American cloud and data platform in a JAMS arbitration, seated in New York and governed by New York law, in a dispute relating to an agreement to develop gaming arenas in the UK
  • A Swedish oncology drug developer in an ICC arbitration, seated in London and governed by New York law, in a dispute relating to the termination of a global collaboration agreement
  • A major Asian petroleum company in an ICC arbitration, seated in London and governed by New York law, in a dispute related to a joint operating agreement to develop an offshore oil field in Brazil
  • A US pharmaceutical company in an ICC emergency arbitration, seated in Zurich and governed by Swiss law, in a dispute related to an escrow agreement
  • A US biotechnology company in an ICDR arbitration, seated in New York and governed by New York law, in a dispute arising out of a licensing agreement
  • A US midstream oil and gas company in an LCIA arbitration, seated in Houston and governed by New York and Texas law, in a dispute arising out of a gas distribution agreement with a Latin American state-owned utility company
  • Telefónica, one of the largest providers of telecommunications services in Latin America, on the US$1.245 billion sale of its Argentina operations
  • Several European subsidiaries of a US public company in the plastics sector in parallel ICDR arbitrations, governed by New York law, against subsidiaries of a US company, in connection with the operation of several industrial sites in Europe*
  • A petrochemical company against a Caribbean state-owned gas company in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) arising out of a long-term gas distribution contract*
  • Merck, Sharpe & Dohme in an ad hoc investment arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) against the Republic of Ecuador under the US-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty arising out of an investment in Ecuador*
  • A leading Swiss luxury goods manufacturer in an ICDR arbitration, governed by New York law, against a Middle Eastern distributor*
  • Helmerich & Payne in an expropriation claim against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and its state-owned petroleum company in US federal court*
  • One of the world’s largest commodities trading companies in a criminal investigation by US and foreign authorities in relation to the company’s operations in Latin America, Africa, and Europe*
  • A leading US media company in a criminal investigation by US authorities in relation to the soccer industry in Latin America*
  • Several individuals in a criminal investigation by US authorities against a US-based ophthalmic company in connection with its medical device business in Asia*
  • A leading US media company in an internal review of its soccer broadcasting rights in Latin America*
  • One of the world’s leading audit firms in an internal investigation related to independence issues arising out of a member firm’s work in Latin America*

*Matter handled prior to joining Latham

Bar Qualification

  • Colombia (Abogado)
  • New York

Education

  • LLM, New York University
    Hauser Global Scholar, Starr Foundation Scholar
  • LLB, Universidad del Rosario (Bogotá)

Languages Spoken

  • Spanish