Jean Pawlow represents companies and individuals on high-profile tax controversy matters.

Leveraging her creative pragmatism and more than three decades of courtroom success, Jean is a strong litigator in matters of federal, state and local, and appellate tax controversies. She helps clients navigate a myriad of complex tax issues, including:

  • Regulation invalidity
  • Economic substance
  • Transfer pricing and other valuation issues
  • Financial instruments
  • Foreign tax credit and research credit issues
  • Tax accounting issues
  • Withholding and reporting issues
  • Excise taxes
  • Estate and gift tax issues
  • Franchise taxes

Jean has a breadth of experience in all stages of the IRS administrative process, federal litigation, and Tax Court litigation. She has litigated cases before US district and appellate courts, as well as the US Tax Court, the US Court of Federal Claims, and the US Supreme Court.

She has broad knowledge of the IRS alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, including fast-track settlement, rapid appeals, post-appeals mediation, pre-filing agreements, and compliance assurance process (CAP) audits.

A recognized thought leader, Jean frequently speaks and writes on industry trends. She has appeared on CBS and CNBC, and was a contributing editor of Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy.

Jean formerly served on the firm’s WEB Committee.

Professional Experience

  • American College of Tax Counsel Fellow
  • Former member, US Court of Federal Claims Advisory Council, Tax Committee
  • Former member, San Jose State University Lucas College and Graduate School of Business, Tax Advisory Board

Recent Speaking Engagements

  • Panelist, TEI Region VIII, “IRS Audits & Appeals Updates” (June 2026)
  • Panelist, TEI New York, “Federal Tax Controversy” (November 2025)
  • Panelist, TEI Region VIII, “IRS Audits & Appeals Updates” (June 2025)
  • Panelist, TEI New York, “Appeals Updates” (September 2024)
  • Panelist, TEI Audits & Appeals, “Foreign Tax Redeterminations” (September 2024)
  • Moderator, TEI Silicon Valley, “IRS Appeals Executives Fireside Chat” (January 2024)
  • Panelist, TEI San Francisco, “Effectively Managing Your Audit” (January 2024)

Jean’s representative experience includes:

Federal
  • Lead counsel successfully challenging the validity of the section 245A extraordinary disposition regulations. Siemens Medical Solutions v. Comm’r, 167 T.C. No. 5 (2026)
  • Co-lead counsel seeking US$392 million refund for section 199 deduction for online software. CME v. United States, Ct. Fed. Cl. filed Apr. 2024)
  • Lead counsel challenging US$1.16 billion deficiency stemming from disallowance of 245A deduction on economic substance grounds. Siemens USA v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Mar. 2024
  • Lead counsel successfully challenging federal regulations issued in the wake of 2017 tax reform. Varian Medical Systems v. Comm’r, 163 T.C. 76 (2024)
  • Lead counsel securing a tax refund of US$200 million for loss incurred when supervisory goodwill asset became worthless. Citigroup Inc. v. United States, 167 Fed. Cl. 476 (2023)
  • Co-lead counsel challenging US$214 million deficiency for deduction of creditor claims. Estate of Fulton v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Apr. 2022
  • Lead counsel challenging US$228 million deficiency relating to the value of an automotive parts business. Siemens Corp. v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Jun. 2018
  • Lead counsel challenging deficiency relating to cancellation of indebtedness income. Dine Equity v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Nov. 2014*
  • Co-lead counsel challenging deficiencies of US$560 million relating to leveraged leases. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. v. Comm’r, 141 T.C. 1 (2013)*
  • Lead counsel for a former US ambassador claiming business deductions. Blankenship v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. No. 28630-11*
  • Lead counsel for closely-held business claiming deductions for compensation. DiMare, Inc. v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Oct. 2013*
  • Co-lead counsel challenging IRS’s valuation of an estate’s assets. Estate of Stanton v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. filed Aug. 2013*
  • Lead counsel successfully challenging deficiency of US$320 million relating to OID interchange income. Capital One Financial v. Comm’r, 133 T.C. 136 (2009)*
  • Co-lead counsel seeking refund relating to satisfaction of a contested liability. Goodrich Corp. v. United States 846 F. Supp. 2d 445 (W.D.N.C. 2012)*
  • Co-counsel seeking US$419 million refund relating to allocation of R&D expenses. Boeing v. United States, 537 U.S. 437 (2003)*
  • Co-counsel successfully defending deduction for inventory shrinkage. Wal-Mart Stores v. Comm’r, TC Memo 1997-1, aff’d, 153 F.3d 650 (8th Cir. 1998)*
  • Co-counsel successfully challenging whether commissions were effectively connected to a US trade or business. Pen v. Comm’r. Tax Ct. filed Jan. 1996*
  • Co-counsel successfully obtaining refund for life insurance reserve. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 195 (1993)*
  • Co-counsel in Tax Court trial contesting deficiency regarding: rewards program; overhead allocation; and investment tax credits. Texas Instruments v. Comm’r, 98 T.C. 628 (1992)*
State and Local
  • Lead tax counsel defending putative class action multi-state litigation asserting imposition of state and local franchise taxes for streaming video services (Netflix)
  • Lead counsel seeking refund of sales tax paid in Colorado for streaming video services. Netflix, Inc. v. DOR. D. Ct. Denver filed June 2023
  • Lead tax counsel successfully defending putative class action alleging unlawful imposition of sales taxes. Skillern v. Peloton Interactive, S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2022
  • Co-counsel in a Washington, D.C. transfer pricing case. Siemens Corp. v. Office of Tax and Revenue, Dist. of Columbia filed Apr. 2013*
Appellate
  • Co-counsel in appellate case affirming deduction for legal fees. Mylan, Inc. v. Comm’r, 76 F.3d (3d Cir. 2023)
  • Co-counsel in appellate case concerning foreign base company sales income. Whirlpool Fin’l Corp. v. Comm’r, 19 F.4th 944 (6th Cir. 2021)
  • Co-counsel in appellate case addressing transferee liability. State of Wisc. Inv. Board v. Comm’r (7th Cir. filed 2020)
  • Co-lead counsel protecting the rights of a lender in a secured debt transaction involving the “holder of a security interest” under Code section 6323(a). John Hancock v. United States (5th Cir. filed Dec. 2009)*

*Matter handled prior to joining Latham

Bar Qualification

  • District of Columbia

Education

  • JD, Harvard Law School, 1988
    cum laude
  • BS, University of California, Berkeley, 1985
    with high honors

Practices

Soft focus bokeh light effects over a rippled, blue water background in the pool.
December 8, 2023 Recognition

Litigators of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs

Latham Tax Controversy team recognized for a Court of Federal Claims win on behalf of Citigroup Inc. in a dispute rooted in the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.

Digital Media concept Wall of screens smart TV
October 20, 2023 Recognition

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs

Latham litigators recognized for a Seventh Circuit win for Netflix upholding a win for streaming services finding that East St. Louis, Illinois, can’t force them to pay franchise fees imposed on cable companies.

Pawlow, Jean A.
September 23, 2022 Recognition

MVP: Latham's Jean Pawlow

Latham & Watkins LLP's Jean Pawlow has represented Netflix as tax counsel in its string of successes in class actions across federal and state courts against claims that it was liable for state-based franchise fees.