Blair Connelly

New York
  • 885 Third Avenue
  • New York, NY 10022-4834
  • USA
 
 

Blair Connelly is a partner in the New York office of Latham and Watkins. Mr. Connelly is a member of the firm’s Securities & Professional Liability Practice, focusing on the areas of corporate governance and securities litigation.

Mr. Connelly has extensive experience in litigation involving mergers and acquisitions, securities and corporate governance issues. He has represented issuers, financial institutions, boards of directors and individuals in numerous high-profile securities, merger and takeover disputes and indemnity claims, and has had extensive involvement in large, complex internal investigations, derivative actions, class action lawsuits and SEC investigations. Mr. Connelly also has experience in complex insurance coverage litigation.

Mr. Connelly is recommended by The Legal 500 US for Financial Services Litigation, and is recognized as a "key litigator" in M&A Litigation. He has served on the firm’s Paralegal Administration Committee and its Training and Career Enhancement Committee, where he ran the firm’s Deposition and Trial Advocacy training programs.

Mr. Connelly's experience includes representing:

  • Certain directors and officers of Books-A-Million, Inc., in a shareholder class action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, challenging a multi-million dollar take-private transaction; successfully argued for application of new Delaware Supreme Court precedent to obtain dismissal of all claims (Vance v. Books-A-Million Inc., C.A. No. 11343-VCL (Del. Ch. 2016)
  • Allergan, Inc. in litigation before the Delaware Court of Chancery and the United States District Court for the Central District of California arising from the US$53 billion hostile takeover attempt by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and activist investor Pershing Square Capital Management; Mr. Connelly was part of the team that successfully challenged Valeant’s undisclosed trading with Pershing Square before the takeover bid was announced
  • Plains Exploration & Production Co. and its directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery in litigation challenging its US$6.6 billion merger with Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.; defeated plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction seeking to delay the closing and require additional disclosures in its entirety. (In re Plains Exploration & Production Co. Stockholder Litigation, 2013 WL 1909124 (Del. Ch. 2013))
  • K-Sea Transportation Partners, L.P. and certain of its directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery in an action challenging the US$600 million merger transaction between K-Sea and Kirby Corporation; defeated shareholder plaintiffs’ motion to expedite the case in aid of a motion for preliminary injunction (In re K-Sea Transp. Partners L.P., 2011 WL 2410395 (Del. Ch. 2011)), and subsequently obtained dismissal of all claims (In re K-Sea Transp. Partners L.P., 2012 WL 1142351 (Del.Ch. 2012)) and prevailed in a landmark ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court. (Norton v. K-Sea Transp. Partners L.P., 67 A.3d 354, 2013 WL 2316550 (Del. Supr. 2013))
  • Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. in litigation challenging its US$9.2 billion acquisition of Southern Union Co. in the Delaware Court of Chancery and in the District Court of Harris County, Texas; expedited discovery and plaintiffs withdrew their motion for preliminary injunction enabling the deal to close.
  • An industrial conglomerate in a breach of contract and fraud litigation against Hoechst Aktiengesellschafft arising out of a US$1.5 billion asset purchase agreement. Obtained partial summary judgment for client on its indemnity claim. (Industrial Conglomerate v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, 727 F. Supp. 2d 199 (SDNY 2010))
 
 
 
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.