Richard Lowry represents clients in complex patent and trade secrets litigation, particularly involving the high-technology industry.

Richard has successfully litigated cases in every major patent venue across the US, including district courts, the International Trade Commission (ITC), and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), both as plaintiff and defense counsel.

Richard has played significant roles in over 20 trials. Acting in a first chair role, Richard secured a series of victories for Amphenol in 2024-2026, convincing the PTAB to invalidate over 100 claims across four patents asserted by competitor PPC Broadband. Richard also represented Amphenol in the ensuing appeals, which the Federal Circuit resolved in Amphenol’s favor.

In 2024, Richard played a significant role in securing a jury verdict for Abbott in a patent suit against Dexcom over Abbott’s market-leading continuous glucose monitoring technology, where he prepared multiple witnesses and developed opening and closing statements.

Richard draws on a full arc of experience, from patent examining and prosecution, to pre-suit investigation, motion practice, depositions, hearings, trial, and appeal. He litigates intellectual property disputes and delivers strategic counseling in a wide range of technologies, including:

  • Semiconductors
  • Consumer electronics
  • Medical devices
  • Biologics and pharmaceuticals
  • Automotive technology
  • Telecommunications

Leveraging his background and experience, Richard translates complex technologies into relatable stories that resonate with judges and juries. He excels in high-stakes situations, where he is known for his relentless drive to help clients achieve their goals.

Richard also maintains an active pro bono practice, representing disabled veterans and those wrongfully convicted with The Innocence Project. 

Richard’s experience includes:

  • SPG Dry Cooling USA LLC v. Evapco Dry Cooling, Inc. (D.N.J.) – Secured dismissal after claim construction for Evapco in multi-patent case relating to industrial air-cooled condensers
  • Amgen Inc. and Kai Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited, et al. (D. Del.) – Secured dismissal for Amgen regarding a breakthrough treatment for severe chronic kidney disease
  • Pacific Coast Bldg. Prods. v. CertainTeed Gypsum (W.D. Ark.) – Secured dismissal of all asserted patents for CertainTeed in multi-patent cases relating to gypsum and viscoelastic glue products
  • Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (I, II) (ITC) – Represented TSMC at the ITC involving the direct and indirect infringement of four patents related to semiconductor devices, integrated circuits, and products containing the same*
  • Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof (I), (II) (ITC) – Represented Qualcomm in a high-profile ITC matter related to an alleged six-patent infringement related to graphics processing, envelope tracking, voltage shifting, flashless booting, inter-chip communication, and carrier aggregation technologies*
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) – Defended Verizon in a patent litigation regarding mobile device technology*
  • Panasonic Corporation v. Magna International Inc. (W.D. Tex.) – Represented Panasonic in assertion of its patented driver-assistance technology*
  • Commvault Systems, Inc. v. Cohesity, Inc. (D. Del.) – Represented Commvault in assertion of cloud and data management technology*
  • BlackBerry Limited v. Facebook, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) – Represented BlackBerry in assertion of messaging, networking, and security patents*

*Matter handled prior to joining Latham 

Bar Qualification

  • District of Columbia
  • Florida
  • US Patent and Trademark Office

Education

  • JD, Georgetown University Law Center, 2016
  • BS in Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 2010

Languages Spoken

  • English