Next Generation Partner ‒ Securities Litigation: Defense
Legal 500 US 2025
Profile
Jason Hegt is a partner in the Litigation & Trial Department of Latham & Watkins.
Jason advises clients on complex business litigation, including securities and corporate governance litigation, commercial disputes, as well as US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other related regulatory investigations. He frequently represents financial institutions, large public companies, and professional services firms, and he has significant experience handling matters involving technology firms and matters involving complex investment products.
Jason also maintains an active pro bono practice representing numerous individuals on immigration matters and in claims against various government entities concerning voting rights and policing practices.
Prior to law school, Jason worked for two members of the US Congress and a New York state elected official and he currently serves as a trustee of the New York State Interest On Lawyer Account (IOLA) Fund.
Experience
Jason’s recent experience includes representing:
Public Companies
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) in:
Shareholder derivative actions concerning Llano APUs in state and federal court, all of which were dismissed (N.D. Cal. 2021) & (Cal. Ct. App. 2020)
A shareholder derivative action regarding the composition of AMD’s board and senior management, which was dismissed (N.D. Cal. 2021)
A securities class action and other litigation regarding AMD’s Llano microprocessors
Litigation related to AMD’s acquisition of Xilinx, Inc.
Apple Inc. in:
Securities class action in which it was alleged to be the “control person” of another publicly traded company
Shareholder suit regarding executive compensation, which was dismissed (S.D.N.Y. 2024)
Farfetch Limited in:
Securities class action concerning its IPO, which was dismissed and affirmed on appeal (S.D.N.Y. 2021) & (2d Cir. 2023)
Obtaining dismissal of securities class action against former directors and officers following Farfetch Limited’s liquidation (S.D.N.Y. 2025)
GlobalFoundries in breach of contract and trade secret misappropriation claims against IBM that were described as “one of the most complex trade secret battles in the semiconductor industry” (IAM, January 17, 2025, GlobalFoundries and IBM Call Truce On Semiconductor Trade Secret Battle)
Northern Oil & Gas in securing dismissal of a securities class action based on alleged misuse of company assets (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
Sinovac Biotech Ltd. in:
Shareholder litigation concerning its 2018 PIPE transaction, which was dismissed (D. Mass. 2023)
Shareholder class action concerning implementation of rights plan, dismissed with prejudice (Del. Ch. 2024)
Vroom, Inc. in winning dismissal securities class actions following IPO (S.D.N.Y. 2025)
Several multinational companies in litigation under 28 U.S.C. 1782
Former directors and officers of pharmaceutical company in ongoing breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent conveyance litigation following from bankruptcy
Directors and officers of an energy services company in shareholder litigation related to alleged bid rigging
Chairman and CEO of a major internet security company in securities class action concerning a take-private transaction
Financial Institutions and Asset Managers
Blackstone and CVC in obtaining dismissal of fiduciary duty litigation regarding a deSPAC (Del. Ch. 2025)
Brigade Capital Management in a series of litigations, all dismissed and affirmed on appeal, related to CLOs (S.D.N.Y. and 2d Cir. 2021-2025)
Deutsche Bank in class action litigation regarding interest rate benchmarks
Deutsche Bank in more than 20 separate matters around the country relating to its mortgage-backed securities and securitized products businesses
Numerous investment banks, including Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citibank, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, UBS, and RBC, in securities class actions around the country, including cases relating to the following issuers:
Gridsum: All claims against underwriters dismissed with prejudice (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
KemPharm: Claims voluntarily dismissed prior to ruling on motion to dismiss (Iowa Dist. Ct. 2018)
MagnaChip: All claims alleged against underwriters dismissed and then settled for no consideration (N.D. Cal. 2016)
Miniso: All claims against underwriters dismissed (S.D.N.Y. 2024)
Motricity: Motion to dismiss granted and affirmed by Ninth Circuit (W.D. Wash. and 9th Cir. 2016)
ViacomCBS: Claims against Latham clients dismissed on appeal (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept. 2024)
Violin Memory: Motion to dismiss granted in part; remaining claims resolved without contribution by underwriters (N.D. Cal. 2015)
Professional Services Firms
KPMG in a RICO class action alleging over $100 billion in potential damages, which was dismissed (S.D.N.Y. 2024)
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in a securities class action related to Aegean Marine Petroleum Network, Inc., which was dismissed as against PwC (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
A Big 4 audit firm in confidential arbitration brought by a state insurance commissioner on behalf of a failed insurance company who sought nine-figure damages; awarded complete defense judgment following a two-week trial
Big 4 audit firms in connection with government investigations by the Justice Department, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and related civil matters concerning companies in the financial services, technology, real estate, and consumer products industries
Qualifications
Bar Qualification
New York
Education
JD, American University Washington College of Law, 2009 summa cum laude, Order of the Coif
Two Latham Securities and M&A Litigation teams notched wins in Delaware Chancery Court: one successfully voided board changes on behalf of minority shareholders in a Section 225 action, and another secured dismissal of all claims for a client group affiliated with private equity firms in a de-SPAC case.
Latham’s Securities and M&A Litigation Practice honored again at the New York Legal Awards for the fifth time in the past six years that the contest has been held.
Latham litigators recognized for securing the dismissal of a securities class action against Vroom in litigation related to the company’s IPO and follow-on secondary offering.
Jeff Hammel recently achieved a career high when he scored back-to-back-to-back victories in three very different cases across multiple courts in one day.
Despite a downward trend in securities case filings over the past three years, Latham & Watkins LLP has remained one of the most active law firms on the defense side, taking over the top spot from Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, according to reports released by Lex Machina.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.