Christopher Henry

Mr. Henry’s experience includes:

• Neural Magic, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook) (D. Mass), representing Meta in its trade secret dispute against artificial intelligence startup Neural Magic, Inc.
• Latch v. LET Investor Group (SDNY; AAA; Virginia), represented Latch in multi-jurisdictional dispute involving trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and civil RICO claims; complete verdict on contract claims adjudicated in arbitration, litigation favorably resolved after dismissal of Virginia state actions
• CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc. (D. Mass), favorably resolved claims for InfoBionic in a suit involving six patents and alleged trade secret misappropriation
• Jaguar Land Rover v. Volkswagen Group, favorably resolved actions on Jaguar Land Rover’s behalf in the Eastern District of Virginia, the ITC, and related inter partes reviews
• Watlow v. Volvo (D.N.J.), defended the automobile manufacturer in a patent infringement action involving layered heating systems and related manufacturing processes; successfully invalidated one asserted patent in inter partes review, and district court proceeding resolved favorable after claims related to a second asserted patent were dismissed
• Digital Video Receivers and Related Hardware and Software Components, Inv. No. 337-TA-1103, defended a well-known cable television company in a high-stakes action concerning digital video technology
• Portable Electronic Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-994, represented a music player manufacturer in a case involving music categorization, in which the Federal Circuit affirmed a successful Section 101-based defense*
• Research Frontiers v. E-Ink (D. Del.), represented an electrophoretic display company in a multi-patent infringement action and obtained claim constructions leading to a stipulation of non-infringement, which the Federal Circuit affirmed*

*Matter handled prior to joining Latham