Chase Chesser represents clients in high-stakes, complex business litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in commercial disputes in arbitration, and regularly advises clients on litigation strategy, risk, and management, as well as white collar and government investigations.
Chase leverages extensive litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels to represent leading companies in high-value matters involving:
Commercial contracts
Business torts
Product liability
Consumer fraud
Deceptive and unfair business practices
Federal securities laws
Accounting disputes
Copyrights and trademarks
Employment disputes
His track record also includes securing favorable outcomes in matters ranging from securities litigation and white collar defense, to intellectual property disputes and consumer class actions.
Before joining Latham, Chase served as a law clerk to the Honorable Edward E. Carnes of the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Experience
A sampling of Chase’s experience includes representing:
DXC Technology in a major accounting arbitration against Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. relating to the spinoff and merger of HPE’s enterprise IT services company, resulting in an award of US$666 million in damages to client after a two-week hearing
A global technology company in a multi-week arbitration hearing involving a series of complex disputes related to its separation from its global parent company
An online education company in a claimant-side arbitration involving breach-of-contract and fraud claims in obtaining a favorable settlement that included a substantial monetary payment and injunctive relief
A global investment firm in obtaining dismissal of a business tort claim related to financing transactions
DXC Technology in securing a favorable resolution of a securities class action related to the company’s business projections
A religious organization in proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation defending against fraud-based claims relating to cutting-edge First Amendment issues, resulting in successful consolidation and transfer and ultimately obtaining dismissal with prejudice of the consolidated cases
A leading producer of electric vehicle batteries in a first-of-its-kind class action involving product liability and consumer protection claims against an upstream component part manufacturer in the automobile industry, resulting in a class settlement for less than 10% of damages sought
A sports organization in more than 400 putative class actions consolidated into multi-district litigation related to concussive and sub-concussive hits in college football
A venture capital firm in securing reversal on appeal of Illinois trial court orders dismissing client’s fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment claims
A Fortune 500 hospital company in obtaining dismissal of a civil False Claims Act matter alleging unlawful reimbursement practices
A national veterinary pharmaceutical to persuade the government to reduce the client’s debarment period
A large government contractor providing engineering services in securing a no-action decision in debarment inquiry related to a criminal antitrust matter
The Carlyle Group and Stellex Capital Management in obtaining US antitrust clearance to acquire Vigor Industrial, an infrastructure, defense, and maritime services company
Qualifications
Bar Qualification
District of Columbia
Alabama
Education
JD, University of Alabama School of Law, 2016 magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, Editor-in-Chief and Most Outstanding Member, Alabama Law Review
BA in English Literature, Sewanee: The University of the South, 2009
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has unsealed an award from an arbitration panel that directs Hewlett Packard Enterprise Inc. to pay US$666 million to Latham client DXC Technology.
A multidisciplinary team advised the semiconductor company in the industry changing transaction.
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.