Ashley Bauer, Co-Chair of Latham’s Bay Area Litigation & Trial Department, has a wide range of experience in federal and state litigation and private arbitration, including antitrust litigation and cartel investigations, white collar criminal defense, and class action litigation.

Ashley’s antitrust practice includes regulatory investigations and the civil class action cases that typically follow. She has represented companies in cases involving alleged violations of state and federal antitrust laws brought by direct and indirect purchasers, including claims of:

  • Price-fixing
  • Market allocation
  • Monopolization
  • Unfair competition

Ashley has extensive experience as global coordinating counsel on price-fixing investigations and private damages actions before regulators and courts in the US, Australia, Canada, Europe, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and South Africa.

Ashley also serves as an early neutral evaluator and a mediator on the Northern District of California’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Panel.

Ashley served as the San Francisco Co-Chair of Latham’s WEB program and as a member of the firm’s Training and Career Enhancement and Mentoring Committees. 

Prior to joining Latham, Ashley clerked for the Hon. Robert E. Coyle in the Eastern District of California.

Ashley’s experience includes representing:

  • Michelin in a multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of Ohio involving three classes of direct and indirect purchasers that alleging price fixing in the replacement tires industry
  • Epicor in a proposed class action in the Northern District of Illinois alleging price-fixing in the convenience hardware market
  • CrossCountry Mortgage in a proposed class action in the Middle District of Tennessee alleging price fixing in the residential mortgage market
  • A multinational retailer in three proposed class actions in the Northern District of California alleging price fixing of disposable household batteries
  • A multinational retailer in three proposed class actions in the Southern District of New York alleging price fixing of non-alcoholic beverages 
  • StarKist Co. in various alleging price fixing in the packaged tuna industry, including a multidistrict litigation in the Southern District of California, a criminal case in the Northern District of California, a lawsuit filed by the State of Washington, and as coordinating counsel in a follow-on Canadian action
  • Olam Peanut Shelling Company in class action in the Eastern District of Virginia alleging anticompetitive conduct in the runner peanut market
  • Kamaya Inc. in two class actions in the Northern District of California alleging anticompetitive conduct in the linear resistor industry
  • Nitsuko Electronics Corporation in two class action cases in the Northern District of California alleging price fixing in the film capacitor industry
  • Singapore Airlines in a class action in the Northern District of California alleging price fixing in the passenger air transport industry
  • Singapore Airlines Cargo in a class action in the Eastern District of New York alleging price fixing in the air cargo industry
  • A global logistics company in a DOJ investigation 
  • An individual indicted for bid-rigging in the Northern District of California
  • A financial services institution in market manipulation investigations by the DOJ and CFTC
  • Two consumer goods manufacturers in DOJ bid-rigging and price-fixing investigations
  • Avery Dennison Corporation in its defense against consumer class action complaints alleging anticompetitive conduct in the labelstock industry
  • Apple Inc. in a proposed class action in the Northern District of California alleging anticompetitive conduct in the market for mobile wallets
  • Apple Inc. in a proposed class action in the Northern District of California alleging anticompetitive conduct in the market for cloud storage
  • Essilor Luxottica in a proposed class action alleging monopolization in the eyewear industry
  • Lundbeck as trial counsel in a case alleging monopolization in the pharmaceutical industry
  • NASCAR in a case alleging monopolization of the market for premier stock car racing services
  • A technology company in a proposed class action alleging anticompetitive conduct involving cryptocurrency
  • A technology company in an FTC investigation
  • An international fashion house in a proposed class action alleging tying in luxury product markets
  • An international retailer in a proposed class action alleging unfair competition in a luxury product market

Bar Qualification

  • California
  • England and Wales (Solicitor)

Education

  • JD, University of Michigan Law School, 2003
  • BA, Scripps College, 2000
Light Christmas Golden Luxury Glitter Background.
October 27, 2025 Recognition

Litigators of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs — EssilorLuxottica

A Latham antitrust team led by partners Chris Yates, Belinda Lee, Ashley Bauer, and Alicia Jovais, earned recognition in The American Lawyer’s Litigators of the Week column for their success defending EssilorLuxottica in an antitrust class action.