White Collar Defense & Investigations

Latham & Watkins’ White Collar Defense & Investigations Practice represents organizations and individuals in the most sensitive and high-stakes corporate crises.

Why Latham

Government investigations are enormously challenging for both organizations and executives. Employees feel intense stress, customers and investors demand action, individuals fear personal disaster, and critics multiply. And senior executives and directors are often unfamiliar with the motivations, procedures, and basic rhythms of a grand jury or civil fraud investigation. When even small, short-term actions can have long-term unintended consequences, a legal team that understands these complexities can make all the difference.

Latham’s White Collar Defense & Investigations Practice includes 40 partners throughout the US and around the world. The team features regulatory practitioners, career defense advocates, and former high-ranking government lawyers from Republican and Democratic administrations, such as:

  • Two Assistant Attorneys General, who led the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Criminal Division
  • Associate Director of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Head of Fraud Division of UK Serious Fraud Office
  • Deputy Assistant Attorney General for DOJ’s Criminal Division
  • Chief of the Securities & Commodities Fraud Task Force at the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
  • Two Directors of DOJ’s Enron Task Force
  • More than 20 Assistant US Attorneys

Latham lawyers are experienced in every substantive area, from securities regulation to healthcare fraud to export controls to environmental enforcement. And the firm has a cadre of lawyers who regularly try defense-side cases, whose courtroom skills are current and tested.

While every investigation is different, Latham’s White Collar Defense & Investigations Practice organizes its approach around certain common principles, including:

1. Experience in both prosecution and defense fosters good judgment.

Latham practitioners understand what is going on because they have been there. The firm draws upon the experience of lawyers who have sat in both the government-enforcement chairs and the client-defense chairs.

2. Latham encourages and rewards teamwork.

The firm emphasizes the value of teams, combining specific regulatory knowledge with procedural experience. Latham & Watkins has best-of-class specialty practices and a system to ensure collaboration without silos.

3. A comprehensive strategy is critical.

A defense strategy should take into account every important threat and trade-off, balancing legal risk and long-term business objectives. Reacting to the crisis of the moment without regard to a company’s long-term plans can lead to poor results. A number of issues — including disclosure rules, employee retention, customer and investor relations, privilege preservation, debarment, obstruction, whistleblowers, derivative actions, and insurance coverage — can come into play in seemingly routine, daily decisions.

4. The more difficult the matter, the more important the firm’s client communication.

Allegations of misconduct can lead an organization to difficult moments of self-perception and second-guessing among colleagues. A key part of Latham’s job is to obtain buy-in on the strategy from the relevant decision makers at all levels and to communicate extensively as the engagement proceeds.

5. Latham strives for excellent relationships with government lawyers.

The justice system produces better results at less expense when adversaries cooperate on procedural issues without sacrificing substantive positions. Latham also recognizes that developing a strong working relationship with opponents generally helps the firm’s clients to achieve favorable results. But if the government is unreasonable, Latham is prepared to stand its ground and to seek relief from superiors or the court.

6.  When a trial is better than the proposed deal, Latham is ready to try the case.

There are many ways to resolve matters, including by trial. While resolution is often an organization’s goal, the reality is that sometimes it is simply impossible to reach a reasonable resolution without litigation. Latham’s willingness to take cases to trial is a critical asset in settlement negotiations.

7. Latham lawyers recognize the importance of managing expenses.

Because key elements of government investigations are unpredictable, diligence with budgets and resource planning is crucial. Investigations and compliance programs should not have lives of their own; rather, they should serve the greater context of a business’ mission and role as a corporate citizen. Latham draws on significant experience using client resources — including funds, as well as executive and employee time — responsibly, appropriately, and efficiently.

Awards & Rankings

  • Latham Recognized Across the Board for Litigation & Trial Prowess - October 14, 2020
  • Kevin Chambers and Laura Washington Named Black Leaders Worth Watching - October 05, 2020
  • Fifteen Partners Receive 2020 MVP Honors - October 04, 2020
  • Latham Named Regulatory Compliance Firm of the Year at China Law Awards - September 23, 2020
  • Latham Recognized with Seven Notable Accolades - September 22, 2020

Latham’s litigators are praised for their “top knowledge and experience in the market,” with clients reporting, “they are always available and are extremely responsive,” and “very professional, extremely efficient, pragmatic and well prepared.”

Chambers Global 2020

Events

Webcast – Trade Secrets Unlocked: How In-House Lawyers Can Litigate to Win (and Stay Sane)ABA Derivatives & Futures Law Committee Winter Meeting10th Annual New York Forum on Economic Sanctions

Media Coverage

Compliance MVPs: Eric Volkman and Hui XuTop 40 Under 40: Amy HargreavesRising Star - Government Contracts: Dean Baxtresser

News

Latham Recognized Across the Board for Litigation & Trial ProwessKevin Chambers and Laura Washington Named Black Leaders Worth WatchingFifteen Partners Receive 2020 MVP Honors from Law360

Thought Leadership

Seventh Circuit Deepens Circuit Split Over FCA Dismissal Authority Presidential Subpoena Cases: Implications for Private PartiesUS Supreme Court Upholds SEC’s Authority to Seek Disgorgement

Webcasts & Podcasts

Compliance Opportunities & Challenges in Latin AmericaGeneral Counsel ForumSmall Business Loans Under the CARES Act: What You Need to Know